Currently

RSS
May 7
Last week and this past weekend were all about The Avengers for me. I saw it multiple times, in different formats, and was wowed and amazed each time. 
I can’t really review it without spoilers because it’s one of those films you just want to completely gush about — although at this point if you still haven’t seen it WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR OMG — so I won’t go into depth. 
I was worried that smaller, lesser known characters outside of the comics world like Hawkeye and Black Widow would be left by the wayside, but that wasn’t the case at all. Each one of The Avengers was given their purpose and time in the limelight.
Loki ;___; I love him. Such a great character, really brought to life by the brilliant Tom Hiddleston. I’m looking forward to what part he will play in Thor 2.
Something I love about Joss Whedon is his devotion to portraying women as real people. He consistently throughout his career has given his female characters depth and facets and everything that is usually limited to males. He did that here with Black Widow especially. Her skills were integral to the plot of the film. 
The action sequences were flawless. Pay attention to the Manhattan climax especially: small things that deserved a closer focus were happening in panned out scenes, and the level of detail there was awesome to see. 
Colbie Smulders as Maria Hill = great.
The Hulk. THE HULK. Brilliant. Every scene with him. Brilliant. When they say he stole the film, it’s true - but it doesn’t at all mean the rest of the film was lacking. And Mark Ruffalo didn’t do a bad job as Robert Banner either. 
I am still in mourning over a certain thing that happened that I should have seen coming because DAMN YOU WHEDON.
Captain America’s ass when he’s working out. 
Scarlett Johansson’s ass when she’s talking to Loki.
There are two end credits scenes, so make sure you stay for both. 
Regarding the first credits scene, it was awesome to see who in the theater was a nerd. There was a lot of confused muttering and silence, but a few people like me screamed out things like “FUCK YEAH!!!” because it was truly FUCK YEAH.
Alright that’s it. I’ll stop. I just can’t recommend this film enough. The best Marvel film yet, by far, and it completely makes up for the suckage that was Iron Man 2. 
[5/5]

Last week and this past weekend were all about The Avengers for me. I saw it multiple times, in different formats, and was wowed and amazed each time. 

I can’t really review it without spoilers because it’s one of those films you just want to completely gush about — although at this point if you still haven’t seen it WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR OMG — so I won’t go into depth. 

  • I was worried that smaller, lesser known characters outside of the comics world like Hawkeye and Black Widow would be left by the wayside, but that wasn’t the case at all. Each one of The Avengers was given their purpose and time in the limelight.
  • Loki ;___; I love him. Such a great character, really brought to life by the brilliant Tom Hiddleston. I’m looking forward to what part he will play in Thor 2.
  • Something I love about Joss Whedon is his devotion to portraying women as real people. He consistently throughout his career has given his female characters depth and facets and everything that is usually limited to males. He did that here with Black Widow especially. Her skills were integral to the plot of the film. 
  • The action sequences were flawless. Pay attention to the Manhattan climax especially: small things that deserved a closer focus were happening in panned out scenes, and the level of detail there was awesome to see. 
  • Colbie Smulders as Maria Hill = great.
  • The Hulk. THE HULK. Brilliant. Every scene with him. Brilliant. When they say he stole the film, it’s true - but it doesn’t at all mean the rest of the film was lacking. And Mark Ruffalo didn’t do a bad job as Robert Banner either. 
  • I am still in mourning over a certain thing that happened that I should have seen coming because DAMN YOU WHEDON.
  • Captain America’s ass when he’s working out. 
  • Scarlett Johansson’s ass when she’s talking to Loki.
  • There are two end credits scenes, so make sure you stay for both. 
  • Regarding the first credits scene, it was awesome to see who in the theater was a nerd. There was a lot of confused muttering and silence, but a few people like me screamed out things like “FUCK YEAH!!!” because it was truly FUCK YEAH.
Alright that’s it. I’ll stop. I just can’t recommend this film enough. The best Marvel film yet, by far, and it completely makes up for the suckage that was Iron Man 2. 

[5/5]

May 2
I didn’t watch The Voice eliminations last night because I slept for 12 hours straight like a goddamn grizzly bear, I’m not sure what happened.
I looked up the eliminations on Hulu this morning, but  I think I knew deep down that Juliet Simms was going to advance. How could she not have, with that incredible James Brown cover she stirred everyone’s soul with just before the show ended? 
Jamar has been my favorite since he sang the first line of Seven Nation Army in the auditions. The only one (of the contestants I didn’t know prior) that made me go look him up online and find out where he’d been all my life. I’m completely heartbroken that he didn’t win the entire thing.
Oddly, his back story had really nothing to do with my support - although he is undoubtedly inspiring. He has consistently been the best performer of the entire show. His vocal ability has been unmatched when you factor in pitch, control, and range along with the song choices. 
His last performance was my least favorite — not because it was bad, but I just didn’t feel it. And that’s the thing that has always made me root for him: his voice makes me FEEL. 
Now that he’s been eliminated, I’m not sure who I want to take it. I like Chris Mann, and have for a very long time, having met him, heard him perform, and sat and had long conversations with him on a couple of different occasions. I don’t care for Jermaine Paul’s voice at all. The question is who do I want to hear original music from? I think I’d listen to an album from Tony Lucca before any of the others. I wasn’t an Automatic Loveletter fan, or else I’d say Juliet Simms. If she released an album covering old school tracks I’d buy it in a heartbeat. You know what, screw all of that: go Juliet!

I didn’t watch The Voice eliminations last night because I slept for 12 hours straight like a goddamn grizzly bear, I’m not sure what happened.

I looked up the eliminations on Hulu this morning, but  I think I knew deep down that Juliet Simms was going to advance. How could she not have, with that incredible James Brown cover she stirred everyone’s soul with just before the show ended? 

Jamar has been my favorite since he sang the first line of Seven Nation Army in the auditions. The only one (of the contestants I didn’t know prior) that made me go look him up online and find out where he’d been all my life. I’m completely heartbroken that he didn’t win the entire thing.

Oddly, his back story had really nothing to do with my support - although he is undoubtedly inspiring. He has consistently been the best performer of the entire show. His vocal ability has been unmatched when you factor in pitch, control, and range along with the song choices. 

His last performance was my least favorite — not because it was bad, but I just didn’t feel it. And that’s the thing that has always made me root for him: his voice makes me FEEL

Now that he’s been eliminated, I’m not sure who I want to take it. I like Chris Mann, and have for a very long time, having met him, heard him perform, and sat and had long conversations with him on a couple of different occasions. I don’t care for Jermaine Paul’s voice at all. The question is who do I want to hear original music from? I think I’d listen to an album from Tony Lucca before any of the others. I wasn’t an Automatic Loveletter fan, or else I’d say Juliet Simms. If she released an album covering old school tracks I’d buy it in a heartbeat. You know what, screw all of that: go Juliet!

This weekend I saw Think Like a Man — for three reasons:
My friends wanted to see it.
Michael Ealy. I mean have you seen that man?!
I miss the pre-Tyler Perry era of black romance films. I mean Hav Plenty; The Wood; The Brothers; The Best Man; Love and Basketball; Brown Sugar; and others. 
I used to like Steve Harvey, back when he was an Original King of Comedy and had his show and everything but as of late, not really. Everything that comes out of his mouth bothers me. My mother tried to get me to read the book that this film is based on a while back when every black woman in America was all over it, but I refused. I don’t do self-help books to begin with, and I have a man — a good man.
I went into this film not expecting much except to adore Taraji P. Henson as I usually do, and to heartily appreciate everything about Michael Ealy’s existence. I also expected to be really upset by the misogynistic and outdated relationship depictions. To my surprise, I enjoyed the movie. It was funny and I felt like it portrayed both sexes in a pretty accurate light - which is easy to do when all of the characters are flat.
I thought Romany Malco was miscast as Megan Good’s love interest and the “player” of the story, but maybe that’s because I don’t find him attractive at all. Also, Kevin Hart is just not funny to me. Loud and outspoken does not equal comedy to me. He did make me laugh, but not nearly as much as he was meant to. I laughed more at the side characters. Although I’m not sure I should call them side characters because as I mentioned, all of the main cast were just as one dimensional.
Sidenotes:
Lala — the MTV VJ that married Carmelo Anthony — impressed me with her acting.
The, um, cameo in Taraji/Michael’s storyline that I don’t want to spoil made me go “LAWD” about six times in a row. Great surprise.
They needed to stop plugging the book. I mean damn. Annoying.
The plotlines were too easily tied up.
When Dominic kissed the top of Lauren’s head I said “he played that perfectly. Wow. That was perfect.” because of what had happened just prior to it. It was a great scene.
All in all, while it’s not on par with the black romantic comedies of the late 90s and early 00s, it was funny, well acted, and I enjoyed watching it. 
[3/5]

This weekend I saw Think Like a Man — for three reasons:

  1. My friends wanted to see it.
  2. Michael Ealy. I mean have you seen that man?!
  3. I miss the pre-Tyler Perry era of black romance films. I mean Hav Plenty; The Wood; The Brothers; The Best Man; Love and Basketball; Brown Sugar; and others. 

I used to like Steve Harvey, back when he was an Original King of Comedy and had his show and everything but as of late, not really. Everything that comes out of his mouth bothers me. My mother tried to get me to read the book that this film is based on a while back when every black woman in America was all over it, but I refused. I don’t do self-help books to begin with, and I have a man — a good man.

I went into this film not expecting much except to adore Taraji P. Henson as I usually do, and to heartily appreciate everything about Michael Ealy’s existence. I also expected to be really upset by the misogynistic and outdated relationship depictions. To my surprise, I enjoyed the movie. It was funny and I felt like it portrayed both sexes in a pretty accurate light - which is easy to do when all of the characters are flat.

I thought Romany Malco was miscast as Megan Good’s love interest and the “player” of the story, but maybe that’s because I don’t find him attractive at all. Also, Kevin Hart is just not funny to me. Loud and outspoken does not equal comedy to me. He did make me laugh, but not nearly as much as he was meant to. I laughed more at the side characters. Although I’m not sure I should call them side characters because as I mentioned, all of the main cast were just as one dimensional.

Sidenotes:

  • Lala — the MTV VJ that married Carmelo Anthony — impressed me with her acting.
  • The, um, cameo in Taraji/Michael’s storyline that I don’t want to spoil made me go “LAWD” about six times in a row. Great surprise.
  • They needed to stop plugging the book. I mean damn. Annoying.
  • The plotlines were too easily tied up.
  • When Dominic kissed the top of Lauren’s head I said “he played that perfectly. Wow. That was perfect.” because of what had happened just prior to it. It was a great scene.

All in all, while it’s not on par with the black romantic comedies of the late 90s and early 00s, it was funny, well acted, and I enjoyed watching it. 

[3/5]

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

Scream
Usher

Usher - Scream

+ + + 

As someone who lives for house/electronica/related it feels weird to say this but I am TIRED of all the R&B from popular artists that sounds like they just discovered Calvin Harris or David Guetta or Kaskade and want to make people dance rather than feel. It is very possible to play around with production and incorporate what’s going on in music today without losing all of the *rhythm and blues* that makes R&B such an amazing genre. 

I’m looking at you, Usher. Climax was a PERFECT example of what R&B has the potential to be in the current and near future musical climate, but then you follow up with this. Another dance track along the lines of OMG and DJ Got Us Falling In Love. I’m boredddddddd you guys.

At first, I loved hearing people rave over these songs and learn to appreciate music outside of what they’d normally listen to, but now I really appreciate what Drake said about not doing dance rap and making music with integrity, not just pumping out what you think will be a popular single. 

It’s not that I hate this song, I’m just really bored by it, and I miss 90s RnB more than ever. I’m just going to be over here in my corner grumbling, and waiting for Maxwell’s next album. Oh, and listening to AlunaGeorge - which is perfect, modern R&B. *grumble grumble*

Yes, I did. NO REGRETS! The other day I took my friend Georgia home, and this song was playing in my car. 
Georgia: Who is this?Me: Justin Bieber’s new song.Georgia: What?! What’s going on here? He’s soundin’ kinda sexy!Me: *snorts and giggles*

Yes, I did. NO REGRETS! The other day I took my friend Georgia home, and this song was playing in my car. 

Georgia: Who is this?
Me: Justin Bieber’s new song.
Georgia: What?! What’s going on here? He’s soundin’ kinda sexy!
Me: *snorts and giggles*

DISCLAIMER: This is long, and contains spoilers. We’re also going to pretend that I’m E. L. James and that I don’t believe in proofreading.
Over the weekend I read the Fifty Shades Trilogy.
Hmm. 
I’ve never read a straight through and through romance novel, except for a couple that I found in the library of the Beverly Hills mansion where I spent one (awesome) summer when I was like 6. I squirrelled away those books in the back of my jeans and hid them under my pillows to read during the night, along with every other unsavory-for-my-age book I could find. A disturbing tid-bit for you — one of the books was an instructional guide to a woman’s orgasm. It was in my nightstand one day, and then one day it wasn’t. I remember being horrified, thinking that I was going to get into trouble, but my grandparents never said a word. Later, I saw my grandmother reading it in the kitchen as I was passing through. She didn’t look up, and I didn’t say anything. It wasn’t until years later that I realized just how, um, ew, the implications of her reading that book were.
Anyway, now that I’ve sufficiently put you off of your next meal - what I was getting to was that romance novels are not my thing. It’s rare to read a book about the human condition that doesn’t include love or sex, and I actually enjoy reading about developing relationships (and who doesn’t love a good sex scene, eh?) but in general, I need something else to inspire interest, so romance novels are never on my “to-read” list.
I decided to read Fifty Shades of Grey after hearing that it was the first true fan fiction to explode outside of its underground, sometimes seedy corner of the internet and be published and have major movie studios bidding over the film rights. I didn’t know much about it, other than it was originally based on Twilight and had a bit of BDSM in the story. I should confess that I am not at all a Twilight fan. I’m more adequately described as a Twilight hater, but I really don’t care about it enough to have a fervent opinion.
The story is narrated by Anastasia Steele (I know, her name is soooo romance novel, right? A close friend of mine is named Alexandria Steele and I’ve always teased her about her Harlequin Books name.). Ana, as E.L. James’ narrator is called for short, starts off living in Seattle with her best friend, working at a hardware store and finishing up an English degree.
Ana, of course, is gorgeous but doesn’t at all realize it, and is completely oblivious to the constant advances from the men in her life. When Kate - her journalist best friend - becomes ill, Ana gets bullied into doing an interview for her with Christian Grey, the young billionaire CEO of a powerful company. Of course, he is the most beautiful man that has ever existed, ever, in the whole world.
And of course he’s completely smitten with her. And, of course, she with him. But, of course, he has a secret. He’s dark, and his interest in her is not necessarily romantic. He’s a sexual Dominant, and he wants her to be his new submissive partner. He even has a contract and a non-disclosure agreement for her to sign. Of course because she’s so damn taken with him, this sweet, virginal, insecure girl, considers his offer. And, of course, because this is fan fiction written by a woman who wants to bone Edward Cullen, when Ana resists, he realizes that holy fuck he’s completely in love with her and will do anything in the world to keep her with him. Even give up something he’s passionate about that has been instrumental in his life from very early on and that he feels is integral to keeping his world together.
I didn’t know anything about E. L. James as a person before I read the books, but reading them I could tell that she was older. I knew she was writing for characters far younger than she herself was and that she had no idea how to. I mean, in the beginning of the story, Christian tosses a shopping bag over his shoulder. What is this, 1996? Who tosses anything over their shoulder anymore? 
Ugh, Christian. He was hot in appearance and *some* mannerisms but infuriatingly broken, and his dialogue was terrible. His favorite thing to say? “Fair point well made”. WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT EVEN MEAN? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? He also speaks in these full, complete sentences, calls Anastasia “Miss Steele”, uses words that no one uses - no matter how rich and professional - and yet was only supposed to be in his late twenties. I mean did the author base him on Christopher Plummer or something? 
Another example of how out of touch James is? The outfit choices. These people are supposed to be in their twenties, and they dress like people in their twenties…in 1996. Wrap dresses and mini skirts and pinstriped jackets with jeans and just stop.
I remember really wanting to like Ana, but then it became clear that she had no self respect. At first I appreciated her insecurity and her willingness to try new things, but it was pretty obvious pretty early on that she was ready to give herself over completely to Christian in order to make him happy, almost no matter what. It turned my stomach when she eventually began viewing his possessiveness and control/anger issues over her life as just an adorable little “mercurial” quirk. I mean, he was literally like STAY HERE AND DO WHAT I SAY ALL OF THE TIMES AND IF YOU PROTEST FINE BUT I’LL STILL FORCE YOU TO BOW TO ME SOMEHOW and she’s all “oh, my adorable widdle baby man!” :/
Apparently, the sexual content is what has everyone in an uproar. OK. Hmm. The sex scenes actually became too plentiful late into the second book. And as someone who is completely and entirely appreciative of kink, including submission, that’s saying a lot. I was totally looking forward to reading about them fucking, even after the deflation of reading that a “hard limit” for Christian was breath control. I actually wanted to get to the heart of why Christian was as fucked up as he was, and with them fucking literally EVERY TIME they interacted, it was dragged out far too long. So long that I became pretty ambivalent towards Christian and his fucked up past until the last 100 pages or so of Freed.
Other random things I didn’t care for:
~ Women do not have orgasms every time you play with their nipples for an extended length of time. Men, please do not think that we do. I mean some lucky ones might, but I’d venture to guess that it’s pretty damn rare.  
~ I can’t look at anyone through my lashes. Maybe the people in this book have freakishly long lashes or something, IDK, but they are always doing it. 
~ Christian came after her, every single time. She would explode around him into a million pieces or shatter into a thousand or whichever corny way her orgasm was described for a particular sex scene and seconds later Christian would shout “Oh, Ana!” and be done. OK. Stop it.  I felt like James didn’t want to end the sex scenes without both parties coming and I would have been totally fine with more scenes fading into the ether. 
~ Christian’s issues stem from his early childhood, before he was adopted by an affluent family. He calls his mother “the crack whore”. And, so does Anastasia. I hated it. Damn, I mean, damn. It turned my stomach. I would go further into why, but that would spoil everything a bit too much, I think. (If you read it, or have read it, I’d love to discuss it with you!) Just, stop calling her that. 
~ The absolute phoniness of Anastasia. She’s a Mary Sue if I ever read one, I swear. It was obvious that many of her personality traits were simply there to placate the reader into hoping everything worked out for her. Her goodness was boring. Even as she struggled with the way her sexuality was blossoming with Christian she was just, too, good. 
~ Christian is described as beautiful, rich, successful, controlled, and controlling - but broken. A “man”, but a “boy” as well. His character was sculpted entirely to please all of the different wants of E.L. James and many other women - the primal urges to have a man that can and will order you around, and the maternal instincts that make us crave the same man be also sensitive and troubled but only if our love in particular is the salve for his wounds. But he seemed…flat. Despite the fact that everything pretty much revolved entirely around him, I never really felt as if I got under his skin.
~ Anastasia’s inability to figure out or make up her mind about anything bothered even me - the most indecisive person on the planet. Of course because a strong, independent woman is not supposed to want a man that will try to dominate her, Ana has to fight with herself internally all of the time about it, but  how often the girl can tetter totter between wanting her ass flogged and being afraid of his spankings is beyond me. Do you want to play or do you want to not play? Are you into being tied up and hit only because you think it’ll please him or because you are find it incredibly hot all on your own? These are questions that I think most people would know the answer to, deep down inside. Ana, apparently, has no fucking clue.
~ The Jack Hyde story. We could have done without the damsel in distress thing happening again - it was already pretty clear that Christian would have done absolutely anything to protect his woman. Or maybe just if the Hyde story was better done? Or if Leila hadn’t happened? 
But it wasn’t all entirely bad. I guess. I don’t know. I guess it was. I still found myself enjoying it though. I never felt like quitting, no matter how off the wall the story became. I wanted them to make it, despite how insufferable they both were. 
There were a few things that I liked about the story: 
~ I liked some of the side characters very much, like Taylor and Mia. I also liked Elliott, despite the fact that he created “laters, baby” and I wanted to punch myself in the nose each time I read any variation of it. 
~ Before they became too often and too repetitive, I did enjoy the sex scenes. Fuck yeah being sexually dominated, and I find power exchange/BDSM to be fascinating,  so it was difficult to not love reading about a beautiful man partaking in this sort of stuff.
~ I really, really enjoyed Fifty Shades of Christian. I would read the entire series over again, gladly, from his point of view. Partly because, as I mentioned, he was completely flat despite his complexities and I want to know more of what was actually going on in his head, and partly because I liked that he spoke pretty normally for a 27 year old top one percent-er throughout his narration.
~ I liked that the Chapters picked up immediately after each other, in the same scene. I’m not sure why. I guess because most books that you read, at the end of a chapter it’s more often than not that they move on to a new day, a new place, a new something. In these books, the chapter breaks were more for dramatic effect than story propulsion. 
~ I liked the way Christian played around with his email signature.
~ I liked Ana’s stupid inner monologue. I liked her saying Whoa and Jeez and all that. I’ve spoken to a few others that hated it, but I didn’t.
~ As a lip biter, I appreciated how often Ana was caught biting her own. Reading the books back to back it seemed like she did it way too much, but, then so do I.
~ I liked that finally, Christian saw Elena for what she was and opened up to his family.
~ I liked the random little bits of information that were thrown into the story for really no reason, like at one point Ana gets up after breakfast to brush her teeth and thinks to herself how Christian brushes his before eating and it makes no sense to her. It made it/her/him/them seem more…real? I don’t know. I just liked it.
~ I had a love/hate relationship with the personification of the little voices in the back of Ana’s mind. Her subconscious and her inner goddess, as she referred to them. It teeters a bit toward love because I always found myself smiling when she said things like “my subconscious sags into her armchair” or “my inner goddess slumbers on her chaise longue.”
~ Oh, did you think that was a typo up there? “Longue”? No. That’s the way it is in the book. Page 32 of the third book. EDIT: So chaise longue is actually correct and not a typo. I wish that that would make these last two bullet points worthy of deletion, but no — I’ll just highlight another of the of mistakes (there’s no shortage): 
Page 339 of Darker: “Hey,” Christian’s says gently as he pulls me into his arms, “please don’t cry, Ana, please,” he begs. Christian’s what says what? His mouth? His penis? Oh, just Christian - not his anything. Annnddd this brings me to what bothered me the most about the books —
I can’t remember the last time I spent money to read something so terribly written. Oh, wait, yes I can - I read Twilight. Fitting, I guess. I think that the editor was drunk while looking over the manuscripts because hell - so many grammatical errors, so much repetitive language, overuse of analogies, stiff and unrealistic dialogue (the appointment with Flynn was PAINFUL), I could go on and on. That can’t really be blamed on E.L. James - that’s something her editor should have really ridden her on, as an inexperienced author. Good books have great editors, and that’s really evident here. I believe that Fifty Shades could have been much better had someone taken the time to really go at it with a red pen. There’s never any excuse for misspellings in a published work. Shame on you, Vintage!
All in all, despite the plethora of issues, if you can “let go”, Fifty Shades is interesting and definitely a page turner. And I feel like I need to hang my head in shame for this but, I really, really enjoyed reading it. If it seems like I’m fighting with myself during this review, I’m sorry. To be clear I liked the books, for the most part. I really did. I’m just ashamed that I liked them because they were so damn bad.  Let’s chalk it up to literary escapism, shall we? Oooo God, Christian actually says things like “Shall I…?” Who the fuck says “shall” when not being humorous? Writing it is one thing, but saying it is another… 
[4/5]
Addendum - movie casting! 
I really feel like this series should be made into porn. Similar to the New Sensations Romance series - which is actually fairly well written, acted, and plotted out for pornography. I could definitely see Xander Corvus as Christian Grey and maybe Zoe Voss, Allie Haze, or Lexi Belle as Anastasia. 
But, since it’s being made into a major studio film, I have no idea. Because really, unless they absolutely gut this book and add in a story more compelling than “will she or won’t she let him cane and clamp her”, I can’t think of one reason why a respectable actor should join. And the characters are too old for you to cast complete unknowns - I think that only works for those that center on teenagers.

DISCLAIMER: This is long, and contains spoilers. We’re also going to pretend that I’m E. L. James and that I don’t believe in proofreading.

Over the weekend I read the Fifty Shades Trilogy.

Hmm. 

I’ve never read a straight through and through romance novel, except for a couple that I found in the library of the Beverly Hills mansion where I spent one (awesome) summer when I was like 6. I squirrelled away those books in the back of my jeans and hid them under my pillows to read during the night, along with every other unsavory-for-my-age book I could find. A disturbing tid-bit for you — one of the books was an instructional guide to a woman’s orgasm. It was in my nightstand one day, and then one day it wasn’t. I remember being horrified, thinking that I was going to get into trouble, but my grandparents never said a word. Later, I saw my grandmother reading it in the kitchen as I was passing through. She didn’t look up, and I didn’t say anything. It wasn’t until years later that I realized just how, um, ew, the implications of her reading that book were.

Anyway, now that I’ve sufficiently put you off of your next meal - what I was getting to was that romance novels are not my thing. It’s rare to read a book about the human condition that doesn’t include love or sex, and I actually enjoy reading about developing relationships (and who doesn’t love a good sex scene, eh?) but in general, I need something else to inspire interest, so romance novels are never on my “to-read” list.

I decided to read Fifty Shades of Grey after hearing that it was the first true fan fiction to explode outside of its underground, sometimes seedy corner of the internet and be published and have major movie studios bidding over the film rights. I didn’t know much about it, other than it was originally based on Twilight and had a bit of BDSM in the story. I should confess that I am not at all a Twilight fan. I’m more adequately described as a Twilight hater, but I really don’t care about it enough to have a fervent opinion.

The story is narrated by Anastasia Steele (I know, her name is soooo romance novel, right? A close friend of mine is named Alexandria Steele and I’ve always teased her about her Harlequin Books name.). Ana, as E.L. James’ narrator is called for short, starts off living in Seattle with her best friend, working at a hardware store and finishing up an English degree.

Ana, of course, is gorgeous but doesn’t at all realize it, and is completely oblivious to the constant advances from the men in her life. When Kate - her journalist best friend - becomes ill, Ana gets bullied into doing an interview for her with Christian Grey, the young billionaire CEO of a powerful company. Of course, he is the most beautiful man that has ever existed, ever, in the whole world.

And of course he’s completely smitten with her. And, of course, she with him. But, of course, he has a secret. He’s dark, and his interest in her is not necessarily romantic. He’s a sexual Dominant, and he wants her to be his new submissive partner. He even has a contract and a non-disclosure agreement for her to sign. Of course because she’s so damn taken with him, this sweet, virginal, insecure girl, considers his offer. And, of course, because this is fan fiction written by a woman who wants to bone Edward Cullen, when Ana resists, he realizes that holy fuck he’s completely in love with her and will do anything in the world to keep her with him. Even give up something he’s passionate about that has been instrumental in his life from very early on and that he feels is integral to keeping his world together.

I didn’t know anything about E. L. James as a person before I read the books, but reading them I could tell that she was older. I knew she was writing for characters far younger than she herself was and that she had no idea how to. I mean, in the beginning of the story, Christian tosses a shopping bag over his shoulder. What is this, 1996? Who tosses anything over their shoulder anymore? 

Ugh, Christian. He was hot in appearance and *some* mannerisms but infuriatingly broken, and his dialogue was terrible. His favorite thing to say? “Fair point well made”. WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT EVEN MEAN? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? He also speaks in these full, complete sentences, calls Anastasia “Miss Steele”, uses words that no one uses - no matter how rich and professional - and yet was only supposed to be in his late twenties. I mean did the author base him on Christopher Plummer or something? 

Another example of how out of touch James is? The outfit choices. These people are supposed to be in their twenties, and they dress like people in their twenties…in 1996. Wrap dresses and mini skirts and pinstriped jackets with jeans and just stop.

I remember really wanting to like Ana, but then it became clear that she had no self respect. At first I appreciated her insecurity and her willingness to try new things, but it was pretty obvious pretty early on that she was ready to give herself over completely to Christian in order to make him happy, almost no matter what. It turned my stomach when she eventually began viewing his possessiveness and control/anger issues over her life as just an adorable little “mercurial” quirk. I mean, he was literally like STAY HERE AND DO WHAT I SAY ALL OF THE TIMES AND IF YOU PROTEST FINE BUT I’LL STILL FORCE YOU TO BOW TO ME SOMEHOW and she’s all “oh, my adorable widdle baby man!” :/

Apparently, the sexual content is what has everyone in an uproar. OK. Hmm. The sex scenes actually became too plentiful late into the second book. And as someone who is completely and entirely appreciative of kink, including submission, that’s saying a lot. I was totally looking forward to reading about them fucking, even after the deflation of reading that a “hard limit” for Christian was breath control. I actually wanted to get to the heart of why Christian was as fucked up as he was, and with them fucking literally EVERY TIME they interacted, it was dragged out far too long. So long that I became pretty ambivalent towards Christian and his fucked up past until the last 100 pages or so of Freed.

Other random things I didn’t care for:

  • ~ Women do not have orgasms every time you play with their nipples for an extended length of time. Men, please do not think that we do. I mean some lucky ones might, but I’d venture to guess that it’s pretty damn rare.  
  • ~ I can’t look at anyone through my lashes. Maybe the people in this book have freakishly long lashes or something, IDK, but they are always doing it. 
  • ~ Christian came after her, every single time. She would explode around him into a million pieces or shatter into a thousand or whichever corny way her orgasm was described for a particular sex scene and seconds later Christian would shout “Oh, Ana!” and be done. OK. Stop it.  I felt like James didn’t want to end the sex scenes without both parties coming and I would have been totally fine with more scenes fading into the ether. 
  • ~ Christian’s issues stem from his early childhood, before he was adopted by an affluent family. He calls his mother “the crack whore”. And, so does Anastasia. I hated it. Damn, I mean, damn. It turned my stomach. I would go further into why, but that would spoil everything a bit too much, I think. (If you read it, or have read it, I’d love to discuss it with you!) Just, stop calling her that. 
  • ~ The absolute phoniness of Anastasia. She’s a Mary Sue if I ever read one, I swear. It was obvious that many of her personality traits were simply there to placate the reader into hoping everything worked out for her. Her goodness was boring. Even as she struggled with the way her sexuality was blossoming with Christian she was just, too, good. 
  • ~ Christian is described as beautiful, rich, successful, controlled, and controlling - but broken. A “man”, but a “boy” as well. His character was sculpted entirely to please all of the different wants of E.L. James and many other women - the primal urges to have a man that can and will order you around, and the maternal instincts that make us crave the same man be also sensitive and troubled but only if our love in particular is the salve for his wounds. But he seemed…flat. Despite the fact that everything pretty much revolved entirely around him, I never really felt as if I got under his skin.
  • ~ Anastasia’s inability to figure out or make up her mind about anything bothered even me - the most indecisive person on the planet. Of course because a strong, independent woman is not supposed to want a man that will try to dominate her, Ana has to fight with herself internally all of the time about it, but  how often the girl can tetter totter between wanting her ass flogged and being afraid of his spankings is beyond me. Do you want to play or do you want to not play? Are you into being tied up and hit only because you think it’ll please him or because you are find it incredibly hot all on your own? These are questions that I think most people would know the answer to, deep down inside. Ana, apparently, has no fucking clue.
  • ~ The Jack Hyde story. We could have done without the damsel in distress thing happening again - it was already pretty clear that Christian would have done absolutely anything to protect his woman. Or maybe just if the Hyde story was better done? Or if Leila hadn’t happened? 

But it wasn’t all entirely bad. I guess. I don’t know. I guess it was. I still found myself enjoying it though. I never felt like quitting, no matter how off the wall the story became. I wanted them to make it, despite how insufferable they both were. 

There were a few things that I liked about the story: 

  • ~ I liked some of the side characters very much, like Taylor and Mia. I also liked Elliott, despite the fact that he created “laters, baby” and I wanted to punch myself in the nose each time I read any variation of it. 
  • ~ Before they became too often and too repetitive, I did enjoy the sex scenes. Fuck yeah being sexually dominated, and I find power exchange/BDSM to be fascinating,  so it was difficult to not love reading about a beautiful man partaking in this sort of stuff.
  • ~ I really, really enjoyed Fifty Shades of Christian. I would read the entire series over again, gladly, from his point of view. Partly because, as I mentioned, he was completely flat despite his complexities and I want to know more of what was actually going on in his head, and partly because I liked that he spoke pretty normally for a 27 year old top one percent-er throughout his narration.
  • ~ I liked that the Chapters picked up immediately after each other, in the same scene. I’m not sure why. I guess because most books that you read, at the end of a chapter it’s more often than not that they move on to a new day, a new place, a new something. In these books, the chapter breaks were more for dramatic effect than story propulsion. 
  • ~ I liked the way Christian played around with his email signature.
  • ~ I liked Ana’s stupid inner monologue. I liked her saying Whoa and Jeez and all that. I’ve spoken to a few others that hated it, but I didn’t.
  • ~ As a lip biter, I appreciated how often Ana was caught biting her own. Reading the books back to back it seemed like she did it way too much, but, then so do I.
  • ~ I liked that finally, Christian saw Elena for what she was and opened up to his family.
  • ~ I liked the random little bits of information that were thrown into the story for really no reason, like at one point Ana gets up after breakfast to brush her teeth and thinks to herself how Christian brushes his before eating and it makes no sense to her. It made it/her/him/them seem more…real? I don’t know. I just liked it.
  • ~ I had a love/hate relationship with the personification of the little voices in the back of Ana’s mind. Her subconscious and her inner goddess, as she referred to them. It teeters a bit toward love because I always found myself smiling when she said things like “my subconscious sags into her armchair” or “my inner goddess slumbers on her chaise longue.”
  • ~ Oh, did you think that was a typo up there? “Longue”? No. That’s the way it is in the book. Page 32 of the third book. EDIT: So chaise longue is actually correct and not a typo. I wish that that would make these last two bullet points worthy of deletion, but no — I’ll just highlight another of the of mistakes (there’s no shortage): 
  • Page 339 of Darker: “Hey,” Christian’s says gently as he pulls me into his arms, “please don’t cry, Ana, please,” he begs. Christian’s what says what? His mouth? His penis? Oh, just Christian - not his anything. Annnddd this brings me to what bothered me the most about the books —

I can’t remember the last time I spent money to read something so terribly written. Oh, wait, yes I can - I read Twilight. Fitting, I guess. I think that the editor was drunk while looking over the manuscripts because hell - so many grammatical errors, so much repetitive language, overuse of analogies, stiff and unrealistic dialogue (the appointment with Flynn was PAINFUL), I could go on and on. That can’t really be blamed on E.L. James - that’s something her editor should have really ridden her on, as an inexperienced author. Good books have great editors, and that’s really evident here. I believe that Fifty Shades could have been much better had someone taken the time to really go at it with a red pen. There’s never any excuse for misspellings in a published work. Shame on you, Vintage!

All in all, despite the plethora of issues, if you can “let go”, Fifty Shades is interesting and definitely a page turner. And I feel like I need to hang my head in shame for this but, I really, really enjoyed reading it. If it seems like I’m fighting with myself during this review, I’m sorry. To be clear I liked the books, for the most part. I really did. I’m just ashamed that I liked them because they were so damn bad.  Let’s chalk it up to literary escapism, shall we? Oooo God, Christian actually says things like “Shall I…?” Who the fuck says “shall” when not being humorous? Writing it is one thing, but saying it is another… 

[4/5]

Addendum - movie casting! 

I really feel like this series should be made into porn. Similar to the New Sensations Romance series - which is actually fairly well written, acted, and plotted out for pornography. I could definitely see Xander Corvus as Christian Grey and maybe Zoe Voss, Allie Haze, or Lexi Belle as Anastasia. 

But, since it’s being made into a major studio film, I have no idea. Because really, unless they absolutely gut this book and add in a story more compelling than “will she or won’t she let him cane and clamp her”, I can’t think of one reason why a respectable actor should join. And the characters are too old for you to cast complete unknowns - I think that only works for those that center on teenagers.

Apr 4
“FUCK YEAH MOTHER FUCKER!!”
5/5

“FUCK YEAH MOTHER FUCKER!!”

5/5

Despicable Me 2 - Official Teaser Trailer 

The girls and I watch this just about every day, and I’ve taken to singing slash yelling “PO-TA-TOOOOOO” anytime I get frustrated. 

(Source: youtube.com)

There are book and movie spoilers in this review. LOTS OF SPOILERS. Proceed at your own risk.
»»
»»

— HEY! SPOILERS BELOWWWWWWWW!! —
»

»
I’ve been seriously anticipating The Hunger Games, just like most people I’ve come across in the past year or so. I was more than ready to be disappointed by it, because hey, I’m one of those people. 
I’m happy to say that I wasn’t disappointed. It was obvious just how much they wanted to stay true to the book and I appreciated that. I felt like the deviations were necessary, not gratuitous. I’m concerned that Suzanne Collins won’t be co-writing the screenplay for the next film, because I think her presence was definitely felt in this film.
I loved the scenery. I’m a North Carolinian, despite being born in California. This is where I was raised, and where I’m from. There’s a scene in which Katniss is in her bedroom at The Capitol, and realizes she can change what her window depicts as outside. She rifles through a few settings (possibly scenes from other Districts?) before coming upon tall trees - North Carolina pines! I gasped right along with her. I live in a beautiful, albeit frustrating and sometimes backwards place. Some of my favorite shots during the film were of Gale back home, in the woods, where he and Katniss belonged. 
I adored the Capitol fashions. Effie Trinket’s nails were on point with every outfit. Cinna - good God, Lenny you are a fine piece of man - was perfection. Lenny Kravitz has this zen aura about him, and that’s something I always imagined Cinna to have as well. His first meeting with Katniss was incredible, just the way he made himself and his politics very clear to her. 
I loved The Girl on Fire. I loved their entrance for the parade. I loved it so much. I didn’t love the dress as much as the black jumpsuits, but I loved it too. I LOVED STANLEY TUCCI AS CAESAR. That smile! I loved Seneca Crane - his beard and his eyes and the look on his face when Katniss shot the apple. Wes Bentley was fantastic. I’m so glad he’s back on track - I’ve loved him since American Beauty.
I loved the little girl that portrayed Rue. She was great, and made me care even more for that character than I already did. I sobbed like a friggin’ baby when Katniss was singing and surrounding her with flowers. 
The ending scene was perfect. It was so tense and succinct. Ten seconds, if that, and I was basically drooling for Catching Fire - which is my favorite of the series. 
Annnd, what I didn’t love: 
The direction. I thought the handheld camera during the fight scenes was a great way to stay within the confines of the PG-13 rating, while still capturing just how brutal the fighting was. The fighting was between children, after all. Although, it did get old quickly, because it wasn’t nearly as well done as it can be (see: The Bourne Trilogy). I also enjoyed the tricks used to highlight how surreal everything was for the Tributes, like when everything was muted for Katniss before her interview. Other than that, I thought that there were too many times I noticed it. I think, for films like this, good direction is pretty much invisible direction. I don’t want to be shaken out of the experience by some extravagant turn of the camera. It’s jarring, and unpleasant. I’m not sure if Gary Ross was trying to make a mark or just didn’t know what to do with himself sometimes, but either way - I wasn’t a fan.
The score. I thought it was overwrought and cheesy. A score is very important, in my opinion. The soaring music when Katniss and Peeta are looking over the food in the traincar? Too much. The triumphant music when they are riding in their chariot? Too much. The music other than those two occasions? Barely noticed it. Not good. Scores are a passion of mine, so integral to making a good movie.
THE MUTTS! They didn’t even attempt to approach what the wolf mutts at the cornucopia were! I felt that that was important, because it was the first time in the book that I realized just how advanced The Capitol was. It had already been obvious, with the medicine and the tracker jackers and everything, but when the muttations showed up and their origin realized, I remember thinking “holy shit.” 
Haymitch was eh. Gale was eh. Peeta was most definitely eh. And what the hell was up with him being smaller than Katniss? I don’t remember that being in the books? Just threw me off. Also - his bleached eyebrows. That threw me off too. 
The main thing that I was concerned about when I found out that they were adapting The Hunger Games to film was how they’d accomplish documenting Katniss’ introspection - I feared that it’d become lost in translation. Her thought process during the books is important, during the development of her relationship with Peeta in front of all of Panem, especially. In the books, most of her affection toward him is for show. It’s a survival method. In the movie, I don’t think that was clear enough. I can see some people becoming confused as to how she actually felt - thinking that she actually fell in love with him. I hope they can fix that in the next film. I don’t want it to come across like she’s just stringing Peeta and Gale along because that’ll change how the audience feels about her.
All in all, I thought the film was very well done, and I’m looking forward to seeing the next one.
[4/5]

There are book and movie spoilers in this review. LOTS OF SPOILERS. Proceed at your own risk.

»»

»»

— HEY! SPOILERS BELOWWWWWWWW!! —

»

»

I’ve been seriously anticipating The Hunger Games, just like most people I’ve come across in the past year or so. I was more than ready to be disappointed by it, because hey, I’m one of those people. 

I’m happy to say that I wasn’t disappointed. It was obvious just how much they wanted to stay true to the book and I appreciated that. I felt like the deviations were necessary, not gratuitous. I’m concerned that Suzanne Collins won’t be co-writing the screenplay for the next film, because I think her presence was definitely felt in this film.

I loved the scenery. I’m a North Carolinian, despite being born in California. This is where I was raised, and where I’m from. There’s a scene in which Katniss is in her bedroom at The Capitol, and realizes she can change what her window depicts as outside. She rifles through a few settings (possibly scenes from other Districts?) before coming upon tall trees - North Carolina pines! I gasped right along with her. I live in a beautiful, albeit frustrating and sometimes backwards place. Some of my favorite shots during the film were of Gale back home, in the woods, where he and Katniss belonged. 

I adored the Capitol fashions. Effie Trinket’s nails were on point with every outfit. Cinna - good God, Lenny you are a fine piece of man - was perfection. Lenny Kravitz has this zen aura about him, and that’s something I always imagined Cinna to have as well. His first meeting with Katniss was incredible, just the way he made himself and his politics very clear to her. 

I loved The Girl on Fire. I loved their entrance for the parade. I loved it so much. I didn’t love the dress as much as the black jumpsuits, but I loved it too. I LOVED STANLEY TUCCI AS CAESAR. That smile! I loved Seneca Crane - his beard and his eyes and the look on his face when Katniss shot the apple. Wes Bentley was fantastic. I’m so glad he’s back on track - I’ve loved him since American Beauty.

I loved the little girl that portrayed Rue. She was great, and made me care even more for that character than I already did. I sobbed like a friggin’ baby when Katniss was singing and surrounding her with flowers. 

The ending scene was perfect. It was so tense and succinct. Ten seconds, if that, and I was basically drooling for Catching Fire - which is my favorite of the series. 

Annnd, what I didn’t love: 

The direction. I thought the handheld camera during the fight scenes was a great way to stay within the confines of the PG-13 rating, while still capturing just how brutal the fighting was. The fighting was between children, after all. Although, it did get old quickly, because it wasn’t nearly as well done as it can be (see: The Bourne Trilogy). I also enjoyed the tricks used to highlight how surreal everything was for the Tributes, like when everything was muted for Katniss before her interview. Other than that, I thought that there were too many times I noticed it. I think, for films like this, good direction is pretty much invisible direction. I don’t want to be shaken out of the experience by some extravagant turn of the camera. It’s jarring, and unpleasant. I’m not sure if Gary Ross was trying to make a mark or just didn’t know what to do with himself sometimes, but either way - I wasn’t a fan.

The score. I thought it was overwrought and cheesy. A score is very important, in my opinion. The soaring music when Katniss and Peeta are looking over the food in the traincar? Too much. The triumphant music when they are riding in their chariot? Too much. The music other than those two occasions? Barely noticed it. Not good. Scores are a passion of mine, so integral to making a good movie.

THE MUTTS! They didn’t even attempt to approach what the wolf mutts at the cornucopia were! I felt that that was important, because it was the first time in the book that I realized just how advanced The Capitol was. It had already been obvious, with the medicine and the tracker jackers and everything, but when the muttations showed up and their origin realized, I remember thinking “holy shit.” 

Haymitch was eh. Gale was eh. Peeta was most definitely eh. And what the hell was up with him being smaller than Katniss? I don’t remember that being in the books? Just threw me off. Also - his bleached eyebrows. That threw me off too. 

The main thing that I was concerned about when I found out that they were adapting The Hunger Games to film was how they’d accomplish documenting Katniss’ introspection - I feared that it’d become lost in translation. Her thought process during the books is important, during the development of her relationship with Peeta in front of all of Panem, especially. In the books, most of her affection toward him is for show. It’s a survival method. In the movie, I don’t think that was clear enough. I can see some people becoming confused as to how she actually felt - thinking that she actually fell in love with him. I hope they can fix that in the next film. I don’t want it to come across like she’s just stringing Peeta and Gale along because that’ll change how the audience feels about her.

All in all, I thought the film was very well done, and I’m looking forward to seeing the next one.

[4/5]

I’ve been sick for the past two days with some awful sort of bug that caused me to attempt to throw up my intestines every half an hour and in between toilet hugging, writhe around on my bed moaning and praying to a God I don’t believe in to make it all just stop. The one thing that kept me going? Workaholics. 
I’d seen .gifs of the show here on Tumblr that amused me, but it wasn’t until it showed up in my Netflix recommendations that I decided to give it a go. Two episodes in and I was officially a fan. Holy friggin’ hilarious, Batman. Some eps are funnier than others, but there are at least two cry-laugh moments in each. 
Only season one is on Netflix Instant Watch, but there are plenty of sites where you can stream season two online. Season three premieres May 29th.
[5/5]

I’ve been sick for the past two days with some awful sort of bug that caused me to attempt to throw up my intestines every half an hour and in between toilet hugging, writhe around on my bed moaning and praying to a God I don’t believe in to make it all just stop. The one thing that kept me going? Workaholics. 

I’d seen .gifs of the show here on Tumblr that amused me, but it wasn’t until it showed up in my Netflix recommendations that I decided to give it a go. Two episodes in and I was officially a fan. Holy friggin’ hilarious, Batman. Some eps are funnier than others, but there are at least two cry-laugh moments in each. 

Only season one is on Netflix Instant Watch, but there are plenty of sites where you can stream season two online. Season three premieres May 29th.

[5/5]